Graded Zero For Opposing Gender Ideology

Fox News | December 9, 2025
Original article can be viewed HERE

A University of Oklahoma professor is now facing disciplinary action in relation to a zero grade given to a Christian student in a recent essay.

Last week, the school confirmed that teaching assistant William “Mel” Curth, who uses she/they pronouns, had been removed from the classroom after flunking student Samantha Fulnecky on an essay wherein Fulnecky invoked her Christian beliefs and the Bible.

Now, an assistant teaching professor is accused of viewpoint discrimination stemming from a protest organized to advocate for Curth’s return to the classroom.

The University of Oklahoma released a statement on social media on Friday evening confirming that a professor, whom it did not identify, offered excused absences to students who wished to join a protest in favor of Curth’s reinstatement.

Turning Point’s chapter president, Kalib Magana, reportedly asked for an excused absence to participate in a counter-protest of the same event, according to the group’s social media, which identified the professor as Kelli Alvarez. In a later interview with student newspaper OU Daily, Magana reportedly identified Alvarez as his English Composition II instructor.

Republican State Sen. Shane David Jett also said that Alvarez was responsible for the alleged discrimination.

But Alvarez denied Magana’s request unless a “documented group [of counter-protesters] could be organized,” Turning Point said on X.

“Kalib should not be marked absent for showing up as a counter-protester while those in favor are excused. That is discriminatory,” the Turning Point post said. “The professor expected Kalib to organize an entire counter-protest with people confirming they would attend, instead of allowing him to show up on his own like everyone else. His freedom of speech and his ability to receive an excused absence were made dependent on others agreeing to participate in his counter-protest and share his beliefs. This is incredibly anti-free speech and discriminatory toward an opposing viewpoint.”

The school responded to the allegation.

“On Wednesday, a lecturer allegedly demonstrated viewpoint discrimination by excusing students who intended to miss class to attend a protest on campus, but not extending the same benefit to students who intended to miss class to express a counter-viewpoint,” the University of Oklahoma said in a statement posted on social media.

A school director immediately responded to the situation and “told students in class today and by email that the lecturer’s actions were inappropriate and wrong, and that the university classroom exists to teach students how to think, not what to think.”

“The Director further stated that any student, regardless of viewpoint, would be excused if absent from class today to attend the protest without penalty, and that the lecturer had been replaced, effective immediately, for the remainder of the semester,” the school said, adding that it unequivocally supports the director’s decision to remove the professor.

The professor was also placed on administrative leave, pending further investigation.

“Classroom instructors have a special obligation to ensure that the classroom is never used to grant preferential treatment based on personal political beliefs, nor to pressure students to adopt particular political or ideological views,” the school’s statement finished.

The University of Oklahoma declined to comment further. Alvarez did not respond to a request for comment.

In late November, Curth assessed Fulnecky, a junior at the school, a zero grade on an essay. The assignment was to read a scholarly paper that summarized a study regarding gender norms among middle schoolers and write a response.

Fulnecky responded in support of gender norms, citing the Bible. She said that God made men and women and that gender norms should not be considered “stereotypes.”

“Society [is] pushing the lie that there are multiple genders and everyone should be whatever they want to be is demonic and severely harms American youth,” the essay said. “I do not want kids to be teased or bullied in school. However, pushing the lie that everyone has their own truth and everyone can do whatever they want and be whoever they want is not biblical whatsoever.”

Curth took offense to Fulnecky’s essay, and gave her a zero out of 25.

The teaching assistant said the essay lacked empirical evidence, which was not a requirement in the grading rubric, which cited three criteria for grading.

Graded Zero For Opposing Gender Ideology

Graded Zero For Opposing Gender Ideology

Related Posts

DOJ Secures Agreements with NYU and UPMC to End Pediatric “Gender-Affirming Care”

Oregon mother is free to adopt after winning legal battle over gender-ideology mandate

READ IT: The Biden Administration’s Clandestine 5-Year Plan To Trans Child Welfare